[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization
|
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
|
Subject: |
Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:12:35 +0200 |
>ah, no! code 1 was *faster* under matlab! the ratio is 0.19:1
>i find this result quite staggering.
Mh. That vectorised code is slower than jit compiled code is strange,
indeed. If your measurements are correct, this may depend on various
things, but these are Matlab's implementation issues.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
Re: octave vs. matlab vectorization, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/09/14