[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls...")
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls...") |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:36:10 -0400 |
On 28-Jul-2009, Christian Weickhmann wrote:
| John, you are totally right, I'd expect such a behaviour, too. But on my
| Ubuntu system ls * gives an empty set and ls *a* gives "ls: cannot access *a*
| ...".
|
| Believe it or not, I just confirmed this strange behaviour on a second Ubuntu-
| PC.
What does
ls --version
tell you? (I see ls (GNU coreutils) 7.4). If you think the
difference you are seeing is a bug, then I'd suggest reporting the
problem to the maintainers of the ls program you are using.
jwe
- Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Christian Weickhmann, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Christian Weickhmann, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."),
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), David Grundberg, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Christian Weickhmann, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), John W. Eaton, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Christian Weickhmann, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), John W. Eaton, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Christian Weickhmann, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), John W. Eaton, 2009/07/28
- Re: Weird problem with function ls or system("ls..."), Francesco Potorti`, 2009/07/28