[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:53:28 +0200 |
>> The question here is whether Xoctave constitutes a derivative work.
>> The homepage says Octave is encapsulated using pipes, which is
>> probably OK (not a derivative work).
>
>It is a derived work if XOctave is bundled with Octave when it is shipped so
>that Octave and XOctave become a single product in the eyes of the
>user.
No, this is not a problem either. Mere aggregation on a distribution
medium is not covered by the GPL. Only thing that matters is the
interaction mechanism. If Xoctave uses pipes to communicate with
Octave, they are two very clearly separated programs, and no GPL license
issues can exist.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
- Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, MMA Bicak, 2009/06/22
- Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/06/22
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, Carlo de Falco, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, dbateman, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave,
Francesco Potorti` <=
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, David Bateman, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, Francesco Potorti`, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, David Bateman, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, Francesco Potorti`, 2009/06/23
- Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave, Francesco Potorti`, 2009/06/23