Re: Xoctave - Human interface to GNU Octave

[dbateman]

Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote:
> 
> 
> This is one of Creative Commons licenses, namely CC-BY-NC. According
> to FSF, only CC-BY and CC-BY-SA are free, and neither of those (in v.
> 2.0) is GPL compatible.
> The question here is whether Xoctave constitutes a derivative work.
> The homepage says Octave is encapsulated using pipes, which is
> probably OK (not a derivative work).
> 

It is a derived work if XOctave is bundled with Octave when it is shipped so
that Octave and XOctave become a single product in the eyes of the user. As
far as I can see it isn't bundled with octave so this is probably ok...

D.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Xoctave---Human-interface-to-GNU-Octave-tp24156773p24167018.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.