help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'pngread' and 'jpgread' usage?


From: Benjamin Lindner
Subject: Re: 'pngread' and 'jpgread' usage?
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:51:02 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

John W. Eaton wrote:
On  8-Jun-2009, Søren Hauberg wrote:

| man, 08 06 2009 kl. 10:42 -0400, skrev Przemek Klosowski:
| > to hear from users about the usage of 'pngread', 'jpgread', and the
| >    corresponding 'write' functions. Does anybody actually use these
| >    functions? I'm considering removing them in the future as they require
| >    external libraries, but I don't see them adding any value as the
| >    'imread' and 'imwrite' functions should cover the same use-cases.
| > | > It looks like I am going to ask a stupid question, but if
| > im{read,write} read the png/jpeg images, don't they need the same
| > external libraries? | | You would think so, but actually they don't. im{read,write} use the
| GraphicsMagick library whereas the png/jpg functions use 'libjpeg' and
| 'libpng'.

I think the GraphicsMagick library ultimately uses libpng and libjpeg
to read/write png and jpeg files.


True, so you'll still need libpng and libjpeg to compile graphicsmagick with png and jpeg support. So you can't drop these dependencies, just because pngread and jpegread are removed.

benjamin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]