help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnuplot-info] broken gnuplot pipe with coloured scatter3 from octav


From: Hans-Bernhard Bröker
Subject: Re: [Gnuplot-info] broken gnuplot pipe with coloured scatter3 from octave
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 22:43:35 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

address@hidden wrote:

I don't get the errors due to an empty color spec though.
Strangely on a different computer I sometimes still get the gnuplot errors.

Did you check that you're using the same versions of everything (OS, octave, gnuplot) on those two different computers?

It  would  be nice if the gnuplot error were more meaningfull to help find the
cause for it.

There really can't be. For starters, we're talking about three separate issues with different likely reasons. So there's no "the" cause for gnuplot to inform you about.

The first error being described most probably is caused by an I/O buffer limitation being hit somewhere between octave and the main gnuplot executable (pipe buffer, Windows message queue). In effect, some of the data are getting garbled or lost on the way, and gnuplot tries to interpret remaining inline data (input lines containing of just numbers) as commands, which it rather obviously can't. Given those circumstances, there really can't be a meaningful error message. There's no context left to reconstruct possible meaning from.

The broken pipe issue with binary data is probably either the same problem in a different disguise, or a generic incapability of the communication channel to handle binary data. Hard to tell without at least knowing the OS platform and gnuplot version.

The third issue could be anything --- we gnuplot people don't generally know what those octave commands actually end up sending to gnuplot. Without that, there's nothing we can do to help.

I couldn't get the hg sources compile because my autoconf is 2.59

So what's keeping you from upgrading it? 2.61 has been around for well over two years now!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]