[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave review
From: |
Francesco Potortì |
Subject: |
Re: Octave review |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:36:14 +0100 |
>> Since Octave is free software, its development is quite open
>>
>> The ideas of free software (the freedom to share and modify, etc.)
>> does not necessarily imply a collaborative development process.
>
>But surely there is some connection? I've rewritten this to read: "In
>part due because Octave is free software..."
I would say:
Octave is free software, that is, it is distributed with a license to
copy, modify, and redistribute it. Its developement ...
And, while it is true that if you want an open development, you will
have difficulties without a free software license, it is also true that
much free software does not have a very open development process, often
simply because it cannot gather enough interest around it.
--
Francesco Potortì (ricercatore) Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR Fax: +39 050 315 2040
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa Email: address@hidden
(entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71) Web: http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
- Re: Octave review, (continued)
- Re: Octave review, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Octave review, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, Daniel J Sebald, 2009/02/07
- Re: Octave review, David Bateman, 2009/02/08
- Re: Octave review,
Francesco Potortì <=
- Re: Octave review, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/02/08
Re: Octave review, Dushan Mitrovich, 2009/02/07
Re: Re: Octave review, Matthias Brennwald, 2009/02/09