help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: indexing expression performance


From: Jaroslav Hajek
Subject: Re: indexing expression performance
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:51:33 +0100

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Weber
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 16.01.2009, 10:01 +0100 schrieb Jaroslav Hajek:
>> >> The dense indexing improvements started with
>> >> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7cbe01c21986
>> >> dated 20th October and lots of bugfixes afterwards. I don't think this
>> >> was in the 3.1.51 snapshot which I think was done in late July. There
>> >> was no 3.1.52 so far. So, if you want these, development sources are
>> >> your only resort.
>> >
>> > I'd vote for a new snapshot. Or, if you can give me a mercurial id where
>> > sources are in a reasonable[1] shape, we can use that for a new snapshot
>> > package in Debian.
>> >
>> > [1]  Reasonable by whatever metric you choose.
>> >
>> >        Thomas
>> >
>>
>> A very loose metric is as follows:
>> Checkout a current tip, and wait a whole day for possible patches
>> coined like "omission from last patch" etc.
>> If no such patch appears, you have a reasonable shape.
>>
>> But, given that there were rumors about making 3.1.52 testing
>> snapshot, perhaps you'll want to wait for that?
>
> How about a snapshot _now_? I mean, it's a snapshot, it's expected to
> contain bugs.
>

Snapshots from development sources are in JWE's hands.

-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]