help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Changeset} Re: cellfunc vs cell2mat speed?


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: [Changeset} Re: cellfunc vs cell2mat speed?
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:55:48 -0400

On 15-Sep-2008, David Bateman wrote:

| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > On 10-Sep-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| >
| > | I'd suggest something like teh attached changeset that improves the 
| > | speed but keeps teh code compatible.
| >
| > Thanks, I applied it along with the additional change you sent
| > off the list.  The combined change is attached below as a single
| > changeset.
| >
| > jwe
| >
| >   
| 
| Thinking about this further we should in fact have single type 
| concatenation specializations in Fcat as well in the same manner as in 
| pt-mat.cc. The attached patch does this and then reworks cell2mat again 
| for even better speed.

I applied this changeset.

Thanks,

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]