[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strange regexp behavior
|
From: |
dbateman |
|
Subject: |
Re: strange regexp behavior |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 06:38:17 -0700 (PDT) |
Ok, I can't test this at the moment, but an internal error in PCRE to me
means that its your version of PCRE itself that has trouble with this string
and pattern. Though to sent a bug report to PCRE lists a short example that
is separate from octave is probably needed to demonstrate to the PCRE
developers that the issue is there and not with Octave. Mathworks has their
own regular expression engine and so its not surprising that it has a
different set of bugs than PCRE :-)
D.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/strange-regexp-behavior-tp19463714p19470602.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- strange regexp behavior, G.., 2008/09/12
- Re: strange regexp behavior, Sergei Steshenko, 2008/09/12
- Re: strange regexp behavior,
dbateman <=
- Re: strange regexp behavior, Thomas Weber, 2008/09/14
- Re: strange regexp behavior, G.., 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, David Bateman, 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, G.., 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, David Bateman, 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, Thomas Weber, 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, David Bateman, 2008/09/18
- Re: strange regexp behavior, Thomas Weber, 2008/09/21
- Re: strange regexp behavior, David Bateman, 2008/09/23
- Message not available
- Re: strange regexp behavior, David Bateman, 2008/09/23