AW: octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71

[Martin Ranftler]

Hi ladies and gentlemen.
I've installed the version 2.1.71 (which is marked as "Testing").

I copy the .m-files to the directory "scripts" (making a subdirectory)

I learn: To copy is not all - what must I do? 
After a new "make install" they run, but I think this is not the right
procedure..

Even when the script runs (after make install),  gnuplot does not start
(like it does in 2.1.50)

Thank you, best regards
mr

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: John W. Eaton [mailto:address@hidden 
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Mai 2005 16:17
An: Martin Ranftler
Cc: address@hidden
Betreff: octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71

On 27-May-2005, Martin Ranftler wrote:

| Now, after reading all comments in this forum I have installed cygwin  and
| octave 2.1.71  in addition.
| 
| But. 
| 
| How can I bring my scripts to run?
| 
| How can I get the same functionality for gnuplot which I have at 2.1.50 ?

If you describe precisely what doesn't work for you, then someone will
probably help you.  But without that information, there's not much
anyone can do to answer this question.

| Shall I propose to install 2.1.50? Here I have an easy installation file.?
| 
| I can propose cygwin and 2.1.71, but with the scripts I have a problem.

2.1.50 is quite old.  I would recommend using the version marked as
"testing" at http://www.octave.org/download.html.

jwe



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------