[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:16:52 -0400 |
On 27-May-2005, Martin Ranftler wrote:
| Now, after reading all comments in this forum I have installed cygwin and
| octave 2.1.71 in addition.
|
| But.
|
| How can I bring my scripts to run?
|
| How can I get the same functionality for gnuplot which I have at 2.1.50 ?
If you describe precisely what doesn't work for you, then someone will
probably help you. But without that information, there's not much
anyone can do to answer this question.
| Shall I propose to install 2.1.50? Here I have an easy installation file.?
|
| I can propose cygwin and 2.1.71, but with the scripts I have a problem.
2.1.50 is quite old. I would recommend using the version marked as
"testing" at http://www.octave.org/download.html.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------