[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retaining interpreter when running script from command line
From: |
Andy Adler |
Subject: |
Re: retaining interpreter when running script from command line |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:57:24 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, John W. Eaton wrote:
> It would not be hard to add an option like
>
> octave --eval "arbitrary-code"
>
> but if we do this, do we also need --funcall?
I would really like a '--eval' option (or just -e). This
would allow me to replace the many scripts where I use
FOUR=`echo 2+2 | octave -qf`
We may not need --funcall, but I propose we leave it there,
since it may be useful, and isn't in the way or anything.
--
Andy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------