[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?) |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:18:11 -0500 |
On 23-Feb-2005, Francesco Potorti` <address@hidden> wrote:
| Why is my box only three times as slow as an Athlon 2000 on matrix
| transpose?
Not all computations are limited by CPU speed, and there is not all
that much for the CPU do do in a transpose operation. You are most
likely limited by the performance of your memory on this operation.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- reshape slowdown?, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/21
- Re: reshape slowdown?, David Bateman, 2005/02/22
- Re: reshape slowdown?, John W. Eaton, 2005/02/22
- False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/22
- False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), John W. Eaton, 2005/02/22
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/22
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), Francesco Potorti`, 2005/02/23
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), mavram, 2005/02/23
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), Paul Kienzle, 2005/02/23
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2005/02/25
- Re: False alarm (Re: reshape slowdown?),
John W. Eaton <=