[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky
From: |
Robert A. Macy |
Subject: |
Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Nov 2004 10:42:15 -0800 |
I did pull the matrix out of my ...random matrix generating
head. I'm one of those people that have the good fortune of
"reverse" ESP, inherently finding the wrong stuff.
--Whether selecting a test matrix, accidentally using ctrl
arrow key during editing [which always bombs octave], or
simply needing to have very large matrices [which also
bombs octave]
But ocatve is still GOLD! Kudos to John Eaton for his past,
and continuing efforts.
- Robert -
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:00:17 -0500 (EST)
Przemek Klosowski <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> For 2x2 matrices made up of integers between -3 and
> +3, the answer is
> obviously 14.4%. If you can't see that at first
> sight, try running the
> attached script. Sheesh!
>
> Very good! but, people don't use negative numbers when
> they pull the
> random matrices out of their... mental random number
> generator. When
> you use apos=2*rand(k,k)*maxval (which is equivalent to
> your a
> plus a constant matrix ones(k,k)*maxval, the probability
> drops by
> a factor of two, to 7%. Is there a simple explanation of
> that?
>
> OK, the official results are in: 3x3 {0..9}-valued
> matrices it's 4%, and
> 2% for 4x4 matrices, and .5% for 5x5 matrices. Funny.
> The originator
> of this thread had 1-in-60 chance of picking a singular
> matrix.
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU
> GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects:
> http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information:
> http://www.octave.org/archive.html
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky, (continued)
- Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky, Geraint Paul Bevan, 2004/11/03
- Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/11/03
- Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky, Geraint Paul Bevan, 2004/11/03
- Lapack issues? (Was Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/11/03
- Re: Lapack issues? (Was Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky), Geraint Paul Bevan, 2004/11/03
- Re: Lapack issues? (Was Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/11/03
- Re: Lapack issues? (Was Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky), Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2004/11/04
Re: Inverse Matrix Function appears a bit wonky, Przemek Klosowski, 2004/11/05