[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 0^0 = ?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
RE: 0^0 = ? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:57:38 -0600 |
On 14-Nov-2003, Boud Roukema <address@hidden> wrote:
| On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| > The 0^0 == 1 behavior is part of the IEEE 754 standard for floating
| > point arithmetic. The paper "What every computer scientist should
| > know about floating point arithmetic" by David Goldberg provides a
| > rationale for the behavior that is a bit different than above
|
| Sorry, to me it seems undecided in IEEE 754:
Sorry, I should have said "I think it is part of the..." because of
the statements in the cited paper. I don't think the standard is
available online.
jwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: 0^0 = ?, (continued)
- Re: 0^0 = ?, Gavin Jin, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, j . e . drews, 2003/11/13
- RE: 0^0 = ?, John W. Eaton, 2003/11/13
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Mike Miller, 2003/11/13
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Randy Gober, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Mike Miller, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Randy Gober, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Mike Miller, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Randy Gober, 2003/11/13
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Boud Roukema, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 0^0 = ?, Geraint Paul Bevan, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Ted Harding, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, John W. Eaton, 2003/11/14
- RE: 0^0 = ?, Mike Miller, 2003/11/14