[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## fftshift help in octave 2.1.35, incorrect?

**From**: |
Hugo van der Merwe |

**Subject**: |
fftshift help in octave 2.1.35, incorrect? |

**Date**: |
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:40:58 -0500 |

**User-agent**: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |

Hello,
I'm running Debian, and have Octave 2.1.35-7
help fftshift from within octave claims:
- Function File: fftshift (V)
Perform a shift of the vector V, for use with the `fft' and `ifft'
functions, in order the move the frequency 0 to the center of the
vector or matrix.
If V is a vector of E elements corresponding to E time samples
spaced of Dt each, then `fftshift (fft (V))' corresponds to
frequencies
f = linspace (-E/(4*Dt), (E/2-1)/(2*Dt), E)
The way I understand the fourier transform, I would believe that the
highest frequency you would get out of an fft would be half the sampling
frequency. E.g. if you sample at 44.1kHz, from an fft you should get a
spectrum from -22.05kHz to nearly 22.05kHz.
Is this incorrect? Because if it isn't, that linspace line must be
incorrect. Taking a larger E will allow lower frequencies, and a more
dense frequency spectrum, not a larger range of frequencies.
I would suggest
samplerate = 1/Dt
f = -samplerate/2 : samplerate/E : samplerate/2-samplerate/E
In terms of linspace, Dt and E this would be
f = linspace (-1/(2*Dt), 1/(2*Dt)-1/(E*Dt), E)
but that is ugly.
Please CC replies.
Thanks,
Hugo van der Merwe
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------

**fftshift help in octave 2.1.35, incorrect?**,
*Hugo van der Merwe* **<=**