[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debugging .oct file building

From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: Debugging .oct file building
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:42:35 -0600

On 15-Dec-2000, Thomas Hoffmann <address@hidden> wrote:

| > Sorry, that should be rebuild libstdc++ to be a shared library.  Isn't
| > that the default now with gcc 2.95.x?  Did you build it from sources
| > yourself?  Did you specifically request --disable-shared when you ran
| > configure?
| No. Just the opposite: install/CONFIGURE says
|      * --enable-shared -- Build shared versions of the C++ runtime
|        libraries if supported --disable-shared is the default.
| So I forced the configuration into building shared libs. The compiling lead 
to a
| struggle that did cost me the whole afternoon. Now that I have this shared 
| I can run the mkoctfile unmodified and get an octfile which I can load, but 
| crashes Octave:
| -rw-rw-r--   1 hoffmann   users          438 Dec 14 11:25
| -rw-rw-r--   1 hoffmann   users       101540 Dec 15 18:18 oregonator.o
| -rwxrwxr-x   1 hoffmann   users       113704 Dec 15 18:21 oregonator.oct
| bash-2.01$ octave
| GNU Octave, version 2.0.14 (hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20).
| Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 John W. Eaton.
| This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
| For details, type `warranty'.
| octave:1> oregonator([1,2,3],0)
| /usr/lib/ Unresolved symbol: elem__C17octave_value_listi (code)  from 
| error: IOT instruction -- stopping myself...
| attempting to save variables to `octave-core'...
| save to `octave-core' complete
| ABORT instruction (core dumped)
| Do I need to rebuild Octave with shared libs now? 

Yes, probably, and if you are going to do that, you should at least
start using 2.0.16.


Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:
How to fund new projects:
Subscription information:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]