[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "partially terminal" rule?
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: "partially terminal" rule? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:30:40 -0500 |
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 13:21 -0800, Mark Galeck (CW) wrote:
> I want to make an implicit pattern rule, such that only _some_ of the
> prerequisites have to exist and cannot be further chained. Please
> tell me how if you have encountered something like this before.
I'm not sure I understand the goal. If make can't find a rule to build
a prerequisite, then by definition it must exist and cannot be further
chained. So all you have to do to get the above behavior, is just not
define a rule to build those prerequisites.
Maybe you can provide an example and explain the problem you're trying
to solve, with details.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist