[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gmsl
From: |
John Graham-Cumming |
Subject: |
Re: gmsl |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:54:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040208 Thunderbird/0.5 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 |
PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) wrote:
If you haven't tried it, I recommend it. It has helped a lot for my
project.
Only thing I would like to see about it is to get rid of the 2 files.
reduce it to just one.
Glad you like it.
The two files were done for a reason. The gmsl file won't include
__gmsl if it's already been included, and to save time the gmsl file
itself is small. So if a project were to include gmsl all over the
place it would be quick, whereas if gmsl had all of __gmsl in it it
would be slower.
In what way does having two files cause you problems?
John.
--
John Graham-Cumming
address@hidden
Home: http://www.jgc.org/
Blog: http://www.jgc.org/blog/
POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/
GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/
GNU Make Debugger: http://gmd.sf.net/
Fast, Parallel Builds: http://www.electric-cloud.com/
Sign up for my Spam and Anti-spam Newsletter
at http://www.jgc.org/
- gmsl, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 2006/04/12
- Re: gmsl,
John Graham-Cumming <=
- RE: gmsl, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 2006/04/12
- Re: gmsl, John Graham-Cumming, 2006/04/12