Re: "_t" type names

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On 10/08/2012 09:16 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

>>>>>> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> […]
> 
>  > -  ASN1_ARRAY_TYPE -> asn_static_node_t
>  > -  ASN1_TYPE -> asn_node_t
>  > +  ASN1_DATA_NODE -> asn1_data_node_st
>  > +  ASN1_ARRAY_TYPE -> asn1_static_node_t
>  > +  ASN1_TYPE -> asn1_node_t
> 
>       AIUI, the use of the “_t” type name suffix is generally
>       discouraged (for names other than those of POSIX own types, and
>       types provided by vendor-specific POSIX extensions; see below.)


Then, I think that I'll use the _p instead. Any better suggestions? (I
don't like a plain name because it does not distinguish a type from a
variable)

regards,
Nikos