[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bug#998903: src:libidn: fails to migrate to testing for too long
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Bug#998903: src:libidn: fails to migrate to testing for too long |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2021 12:40:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> writes:
> The problem is that arch:all cruft is not automatically cleaned up, but
> in this case, the dropped binary also had a reverse dependency (just
> filed a bug about that), so I don't know if the cruft binary should just
> be removed (with the new source package that added the binary that
> depends on it).
Hi Paul! Thanks for identifying the issue and helping here.
The removed libidn11-java package did not have a reverse dependency when
libidn was uploaded to unstable (2021-08-22) or migrated to testing
(2021-09-03). The package libxmpp-java that depends on libidn11-java
was uploaded on 2021-10-14.
It would have been better if https://bugs.debian.org/993294 was fixed
before the libxmpp-java package was uploaded, that created a new reverse
dependency that didn't exist before.
James, what do you think? Is the libidn11-java package important for
you to have in Debian? My perception was that nobody really used it,
and IDNA2003/StringPrep is old technology so it feels strange that new
code is coming around using. While I am also upstream of this Java
code, I'm not familiar with how Java stuff is packaged/used in Debian,
and maybe there is another way of doing things that is just as easy for
you.
I could re-add the libidn11-java package if it really is needed, but I
was hoping to get rid of old code that showed signs of very little use
historically.
What do you think?
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature