|
| From: | Gregory Heytings |
| Subject: | Re: Undo defalias |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:58:54 +0000 |
There's admittedly the possibility/risk that you hit `C-g` (or some similar error occurred) right at the specific moment when `cl-letf` was executing the second part of the `unwind-protect` (i.e. the one that reset `message` to its previous definition).That's a known hole in our system.
Should we not inhibit-quit around the unwind-form of cl-letf to avoid this? Otherwise the promise of cl-letf ("On exit, either normally or because of a `throw' or error, the PLACEs are set back to their original values.") is not fulfilled. (And yes, I know that, even with inhibit-quit, it is still possible that a C-g would be processed just before we bind inhibit-quit.)
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |