[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu vs. xemacs
From: |
Hadron Quark |
Subject: |
Re: gnu vs. xemacs |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:23:27 +0100 |
Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
> * Tim X. (2006-12-29 10:53 +1100) said:
> ^^^^^^
> [...]
>
>> Perhaps your right - I guess what got to me was the fact the
>> respondent was able to take the time to correct a common error which
>> nearly everyone is guilty of, but failed to actually address the OPs
>> question in any way. I mean, is he going to correct every post that
>> refers to just Linux rather than GNU/Linux?
>
> In every emacs-* mailing lists, it has been extremely consistent to
> use Linux and GNU/Linux i.e. Linux means the kernel and GNU/Linux is
> the operating system that contains a Linux kernel.
>
> Making effort to preserve this consistence should be appreciated.
This is simply not true.
In nearly all but the kernel groups, "Linux" is known or accepted as Gnu/Linux.
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, (continued)
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Alexey Pustyntsev, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs,
Hadron Quark <=
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/29
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, David Kastrup, 2006/12/27
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, insert name, 2006/12/28