[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux"
From: |
Alexey Pustyntsev |
Subject: |
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Dec 2006 03:27:30 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.0.50 |
"Micha Feigin" <michf@post.tau.ac.il> writes:
> The operating system is the kernel. GNU is one of the more popular option (but
> not the only one) for the tools running over the operating system. I think
> GNU/Linux is just RMS being overly pushy and and egomaniac.
>
RMS is neither pushy nor egomaniac. 'GNU/Linux' is absolutely correct
and fair term as the GNU tools and the kernel are practically
indispensable to get the OS running.
--
Rgds
Alexey
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, (continued)
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Sven Bretfeld, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ramprasad, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux",
Alexey Pustyntsev <=
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Hadron Quark, 2006/12/29
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/29
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, David Kastrup, 2006/12/27
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, insert name, 2006/12/28