[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:39:40 +0200 |
> From: Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@web.de>
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:17:22 +0100
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>
> > It is not clear to me whether you mean that this is a bug in ps-
> > print.el or that it is a limitation in the current handling of
> > fonts in PostScript. I am sorry that I do not understand this yet,
> > but can you explain the status of this again?
>
> It is both! ps-print.el destroys the original encoding, and PS
> usually handles font encodings with up to 256 mappings. (And ps-
> print.el has no code to handle CID encoded fonts with up to 64 K
> mappings.)
Would you please stop spreading incorrect information? Emacs includes
ps-mule.el, which is an add-on to ps-print that allows Emacs to print
any characters supported by Emacs on a PostScript printer. Perhaps
you should look at the code before you talk about what is and what
isn't a bug there.
- Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, (continued)
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/01/03
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, BRUCE INGALLS, 2006/01/03
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/05
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/01/05
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/06
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/01/06
Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/06
PostScript printing Latin-N (with N != 1) (was: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs), Reiner Steib, 2006/01/10
Re: PostScript printing Latin-N (with N != 1) (was: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/10
Re: PostScript printing Latin-N (with N != 1), Reiner Steib, 2006/01/11
Re: PostScript printing Latin-N (with N != 1), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/11
Re: PostScript printing Latin-N (with N != 1), Reiner Steib, 2006/01/12