[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term"
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term" |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jul 2003 08:16:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
> Hey, that is pretty cool. I never paid any attention to eshell.
> can one access inputrc (readline) commands somehow?
Your .inputrc trick is really cool. It could make life a lot
easier -- now I just have to think of the keys and the corresponding
bindings :-)
In eshell, maybe abbrevs could do something similar?
And then, of course, you can always do
(defun hp-eshell-perl-cpan ()
(interactive)
(insert "perl -MCPAN -e shell"))
(require 'eshell)
(define-key eshell-mode-map 'hp-eshell-cpan)
I hope it works.
--
~/.signature