[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term"
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
Subject: |
Re: Why have "shell" when there's "term" |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Jul 2003 17:05:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Matthias Meulien <cimosque@free.fr> writes:
> Here is a silly answer: eshell has too much functionality! When you
> have to run a remote shell (with ssh for example), you must switch
> back to bash... which is confusing if you are used to eshell
> improvments. I think shell-mode behavior is more closer to bash...
In principle you can use Tramp and Ange-FTP to use eshell on remote
directories -- just cd into the right directory, instead of invoking
ssh directly. With the most recent version of Tramp, for example:
cd /ssh:user@host:/some/directory
some_command
Hm. But it's not working right. Darn. Gotta fix Tramp...
--
~/.signature