[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking Process Status
From: |
CarlC |
Subject: |
Re: Checking Process Status |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:42:26 GMT |
"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
x565s1ro9r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:x565s1ro9r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
> Your code programmed a busy wait. That's ugly, butt-ugly. Instead
> just let your code be run when the process has finished. Anyhow, if
> at all, you would need to compare to symbols 'run and 'exit, not
> strings.
Understood. My concern is that this routine is going to possibly open a new
buffer, and change point. I didn't want the user to wander around during the
compile and then have emacs zap him a new screen. I will take your advice
into consideration.
- Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status,
CarlC <=
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, Jay Belanger, 2003/02/04
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/10
- Re: Checking Process Status, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/11
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kai Großjohann, 2003/02/13