[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking Process Status
From: |
CarlC |
Subject: |
Re: Checking Process Status |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Feb 2003 22:15:16 GMT |
"David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
x5wukhv20i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:x5wukhv20i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
> Save the old value of the process' sentinel, enter your own function
> there, and have that do its work as well as calling the saved
> sentinel.
Thanks for the quick response, David. I guess I need to know why this is the
case. If I can get a process-status, why do I need to modify the compile
sentinel. Does the existing sentinel wrap it up so that I can't access it's
status? This doesn't appear to be the case when I am debugging. I can set a
variable and view its status as "run". If I can do this, why can't I add a
conditional to check this status outside of the sentinel? I just want to
know if the compilation process is running. Thanks, again.
- Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status,
CarlC <=
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/03
- Re: Checking Process Status, Jay Belanger, 2003/02/04
- Re: Checking Process Status, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/02/10
- Re: Checking Process Status, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/02/11
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, David Kastrup, 2003/02/12
- Re: Checking Process Status, CarlC, 2003/02/12