help-cgicc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [help-cgicc] Limits in getDoubleValue and getIntegerValue


From: Carsten P. Gehrke
Subject: RE: [help-cgicc] Limits in getDoubleValue and getIntegerValue
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:46:29 -0800

Ah, I was trying to avoid calling getDoubleValue twice... Oh well, perhaps a method or a flag in a future release?? Thanks for your response.


At 20:14 04-11-02, Stephen F. Booth wrote:
There is no built-in function to do what you describe, but I can think
of a fairly simple way to accomplish what you want to do.  If you call
getDoubleValue() with no limits, it will trim the return only to the
largest and smallest allowable double values- you could use this return
value and compare it to the returned "trimmed" value- if they differed
you would know that one of your limits was used.

Does this help at all?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On
Behalf
> Of Carsten P. Gehrke
> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 4:07 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [help-cgicc] Limits in getDoubleValue and getIntegerValue
>
> As I understand from the documentation and the source code, the
> FormEntry::getDoubleValue method silently clamps the returned value to
the
> min and max parameters, if these are given.  Is there any way to check
if
> the value of the CGI parameter was outside the limits?  E.g. if I have
a
> CGI argument list containing d=85.9, and I use getDoubleValue(-75.0,
> 75.0),
> the value I get for d will be 75.0, while a CGI with d=75.0 would also
> give
> me a value of 75.0.  It would be useful to know that in the first case
the
> value of d was outside the limits, while in the second case it was OK.
>
> I think the same applies to the getIntegerValue method.
>
> Thank you,
> Carsten
>

--
========================================================================
                            Carsten P. Gehrke
                     mailto:address@hidden
========================================================================







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]