Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/pointers article.rst

[Tuomas Lukka]

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:04:57PM +0200, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> 
> Tuomas J. Lukka wrote:
> | +The Storm abstraction does not provide any new functionality;
> | +indeed, it does not provide all the features of advanced
> | +systems such as OceanStore or Freenet.
> | +Rather, it is the *least requirements*
> | +on which a pointer records -based
> | +P2P Web system may be built.
> 
> What?!? This is bogus; an application need not implement block-level
> storage and a network need not implement general reverse indexing to
> make use of pointer records.

Ok, some other way of expressing it? A minimal convenient set?
Or a minimal set in context of ...

Since otherwise the Storm data model just floats around here, without
any reason to attach it to the previous.

        Tuomas