[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch
From: |
Curt Hibbs |
Subject: |
RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:14:45 -0700 |
Tom Sawyer wrote:
>
> first let me tahnk you for all your input. i think the SWT idea is a
> very smart, practical and plausble appraoch and if i can orgianize the
> logistics of accomplishing it, then i think it a worthy of pursuit that
> we may take. i would say that, at this moment, i am squarely in the
> middle of this and could go either way depending.
Ok, I'm hope I'm not going to regret this, but I am going to volunteer to at
least get an SWT-Ruby started -- at least the porting of the C code. I
really want to see this happen, and I can't run FreeRIDE anyway because of
the FOX threading problem under windows.
Curt
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, (continued)
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Rich Kilmer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch,
Curt Hibbs <=
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Rich Kilmer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Rich Kilmer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/27
- [rgui-dev] We don't need no stinking bindings!, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Massimiliano Mirra, 2002/08/25