[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch
From: |
Rich Kilmer |
Subject: |
RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:45:02 -0400 |
Hello everyone...I was wondering where all the FreeRIDE folks went to
;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Curt Hibbs
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:17 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch
>
>
> Laurent Julliard wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > please consider all this carefully. i can tell you are
> very psyched
> > > about the idea of having a "SWT for Ruby" and that certainly has
> > > merit. perhaps too, you believe by lifting the SWT code
> we can get
> > > this done faster. i can understand both these thoughts. but be
> > > reassured, while our work may not be as refined as SWT
> for awhile,
> > > we will actually have a basic working system of extrodinary
> > > capability beyond that of SWT in rather short order.
> > >
> >
> > I don't think my view is incompatible with yours. What I'm
> saying is
> > that SWT is a great source of inspiration on how to *do*
> (=implement)
> > things from an engineering standpoint. If you have it right
> like the
> > SWT people did then you can confortably build any level of
> > sophistication in pure Ruby either in terms of widgets or
> programming
> > model.
>
> Laurent is doing a good job of pushing/supporting the SWT
> approach, so I won't repeat any of that other than to say I
> agree with him 100%.
>
> Having said that, my real motive is to have an usable GUI
> toolkit for FreeRIDE (and Ruby applications built using
> FreeRIDE). I will support *any* effort that promises to give
> me that. However, my personal *ideal* solution would have an
> SWT-Ruby at the low-level and GUtopIa at the high-level.
>
> Curt
I am also interested in Laurent's approach, especially the parsing of
the existing C code and generating Ruby-C code...or better yet, Ruby/DL
code ( http://kt-www.jaist.ac.jp/~ttate/ruby/ruby-dl.html ). Ruby/DL is
included in 1.7.2 now and lets you call .dll/.so files w/out writing (or
having to compile) C extensions. Anyway, if we need to parse C code I
have been working with rlex and ryacc so we could get a
tokenizer/grammer file for the C code and build a translator to Ruby/C
or Ruby/DL. Sounds like FUN :-)
-rich
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, (continued)
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/28
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch,
Rich Kilmer <=
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Tom Sawyer, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Rich Kilmer, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Laurent Julliard, 2002/08/27
- Re: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Kero van Gelder, 2002/08/27
- RE: [rgui-dev] RE: Backend Debouch, Curt Hibbs, 2002/08/27