[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem
From: |
Greg Hogan |
Subject: |
Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:21:33 -0400 |
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 4:37 AM MSavoritias <email@msavoritias.me> wrote:
>
> 1. Add a clear disclaimer/requirment that any new package that is added
> in Guix, the person has to give consent or get consent from the person
> that the package is written in. This needs to be added in the docs and
> in the email procedures.
You will be happy to know that Guix has always had this requirement
[1] by only packaging software licensed with the four essential
freedoms [2]. It's the first item on the Guix homepage.
[1] https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Software-Freedom.html
[2] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, (continued)
- Exclude checker with package properties [draft PATCH], Simon Tournier, 2024/06/21
- Re: Exclude checker with package properties [draft PATCH], Felix Lechner, 2024/06/21
- Re: Exclude checker with package properties [draft PATCH], Simon Tournier, 2024/06/21
- Re: Exclude checker with package properties [draft PATCH], Simon Tournier, 2024/06/21
- Draft: dry-run + Exclude checker with package properties, Simon Tournier, 2024/06/22
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Simon Tournier, 2024/06/20
Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem,
Greg Hogan <=
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, MSavoritias, 2024/06/18
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Greg Hogan, 2024/06/18
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Ian Eure, 2024/06/18
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, MSavoritias, 2024/06/19
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Efraim Flashner, 2024/06/19
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Felix Lechner, 2024/06/19
- Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, MSavoritias, 2024/06/20
Re: Next Steps For the Software Heritage Problem, Efraim Flashner, 2024/06/19
About SWH, let avoid the wrong discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/06/21