[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The case for moving raw binaries
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: The case for moving raw binaries |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 21:57:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op do 28-04-2022 om 19:27 [+0200]:
> > How does this help with double wrapping? Whether the wrappers /
> > originals are put in /bin or $RAWBIN_DIR, it's still wrapped twice.
> Because $RAWBIN_DIR can be ignored when wrapping. This means that
> stuff that's already in it won't be added again.
> [...]
> Constructing the wrapper is not so much the problem, it's not
> wrapping the already wrapped binaries.
Why can $RAWBIN_DIR be ignored when wrapping? If the build system just
sets $X during its wrappers, but the application needs $Y as well
(wrapped in a build phase), then if the extra wrapping is cancelled,
then the application won't get its $Y variable, which seems like a bug
to me.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: The case for moving raw binaries, zimoun, 2022/04/29