[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The case for moving raw binaries
|
From: |
Maxime Devos |
|
Subject: |
Re: The case for moving raw binaries |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:50:21 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op do 28-04-2022 om 18:37 [+0200]:
> So, what do you think? Any candidates for $RAWBIN_DIR that we can
> bikeshed? Any disagreements?
/gnu/HASH-.../unwrapped-bin. Benefit above /gnu/HASH-
.../libexec/SOMETHING/bin: the 'dirname' of $0 points to PREXIX, like
for binaries in .../bin, whereas for libexec, the dirname points to a
subdirectory of PREFIX, which some applications might not expect.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: The case for moving raw binaries, zimoun, 2022/04/29