[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:14:44 -0500 |
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> Am Sonntag, dem 02.01.2022 um 17:57 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> Hi Liliana,
>>
>> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Am Samstag, dem 01.01.2022 um 15:37 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> > > Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > > > Where is the Cantor-style diagonalization argument that you
>> > > > > spoke of?
>> > > > You skipped over it, read again. The key point is that you're
>> > > > referencing the thing you think will be invalidated to create
>> > > > your scheme.
>> > > I've carefully read your message at least 4 times, but I've been
>> > > unable to find anything resembling Cantor's diagonalization
>> > > argument in there. Does anyone else see it? Perhaps my powers
>> > > of recognition are too weak.
>> > Can I help your powers of recognition by describing everything in
>> > terms of Turing machines?
>>
>> How about pointing out what acts as the diagonal in your reasoning?
> If you are talking specifically about the uncountability of real
> numbers, that'd be quite deep down (as in an uncountability of push
> actions to a particular Git repo, particularly if we also allow
> reinitialization).
Hmm. I think that the set of push actions to a particular Git repo is
countable, even if we allow reinitialization. What makes you think that
it's uncountable? I'd be very curious to see your argument for that.
> My overview was admittedly too high-level; I jumped
> ahead to the "this sentence is a lie" statement, which is "I trust,
> that this tag which I don't trust, resolves to a particular commit".
> Mea culpa.
I appreciate these words, thank you.
Regards,
Mark
--
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>.
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/01
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/01
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/01
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/01
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/02
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/03
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/04
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/04
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/05
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/05
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Mark H Weaver, 2022/01/06
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/06
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, zimoun, 2022/01/02
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/02
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, zimoun, 2022/01/03
- Re: On raw strings in <origin> commit field, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/01/03