[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package
From: |
Chris Marusich |
Subject: |
Re: The purpose of the "license" list of a Guix package |
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2021 12:23:45 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> writes:
> In the end, I think a packager is expected to be operating in good
> faith, in accordance with the FSDG. This means that packagers look for
> freedom issues and address them when found. It does not mean that
> packagers are expected to provide a detailed "bill of materials" for
> every single package, although that is certainly something that some
> people think is important (and some people don't).
Another way of saying this is that, in my understanding, the license
field is "just a hint". It should be a useful hint, of course, but it
is still just a hint, rather than an exhaustive or authoritative
description of all licensing implications for all use cases.
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Jam: which licence is this?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/05/02