guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jam: which licence is this?


From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: Re: Jam: which licence is this?
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 13:42:16 -0400

Hi Jack,

Jack Hill <jackhill@jackhill.us> writes:

> I'm working on packaging the Argyll Color Management System for Guix. To 
> build, it uses the Jam tool, which has the following license:
>
> ```
> This is Release 2.5 of Jam, a make-like program.
>
> License is hereby granted to use this software and distribute it
> freely, as long as this copyright notice is retained and modifications
> are clearly marked.
>
> ALL WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.
> ```
>
> Which license is this?

Thanks very much for your diligence here.

I looked into it, and Debian calls this the "Perforce" license.  The
"copyright" file for Debian's 'boost' package includes the following
lines:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
License: Perforce
 License is hereby granted to use this software and distribute it
 freely, as long as this copyright notice is retained and modifications
 are clearly marked.
 .
 ALL WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

<https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/boost1.67/boost1.67_1.67.0-13+deb10u1_copyright>

Maybe this should be added to (guix licenses) as 'perforce', or perhaps
'perforce-jam'?

Thoughts?

      Mark

-- 
Support Richard Stallman against the vicious disinformation campaign
against him and the FSF.  See <https://stallmansupport.org> for more.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]