[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Buying AArch64 hardware?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Buying AArch64 hardware? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:42:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> I volunteer to host one or two workstation-type 64-bit ARM machines.
>
> Concretely, this would mean a Honeycomb LX2 or Ampere ALTRA workstation,
> since I don't believe there are any other aarch64 workstations available
> for sale.
>
> https://www.solid-run.com/arm-servers-networking-platforms/honeycomb-workstation/
> https://store.avantek.co.uk/ampere-altra-64bit-arm-workstation.html
Let’s do that! We can already buy one or two and ship it to your place.
If it works well, we can later expand and ship it to the other people
who volunteers.
We can work out practical details on guix-sysadmin, such as finding who
does the initial payment (currently the process to access money held at
the FSF is through reimbursement, with an invoice).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, (continued)
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Vincent Legoll, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/03/25
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/25
- Buying AArch64 hardware?,
Ludovic Courtès <=