[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patchi
|
From: |
Vincent Legoll |
|
Subject: |
Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:24:40 +0100 |
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:51 PM Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> > We bought a handful of Overdrive 1000 in the past (they are no longer
> > sold), and hosting was always an obstacle.
>
> I volunteer to host one or two workstation-type 64-bit ARM machines.
I already volunteered (privately) to host the same (1 or 2 WS power-class),
currently on ADSL uplink (so not for substitute distribution, only building),
FTTH in the future, no UPS though.
--
Vincent Legoll
- Guix moving too fast?, (continued)
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/17
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/17
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/20
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/03/23
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching,
Vincent Legoll <=
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/24
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Mathieu Othacehe, 2021/03/25
- Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching, Leo Famulari, 2021/03/25
- Buying AArch64 hardware?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/30