[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNOME 40
From: |
Léo Le Bouter |
Subject: |
Re: GNOME 40 |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:33:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 16:48 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> How is it more flexible than a "wip-*" branch on Savannah?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
Because as the GNU Guix project we have no control on the forge to
catter it to our own needs, because there is bureaucracy involved with
approving new committers so they can work on wip branches (shouldnt be
necessary).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah (was: Re: GNOME 40), (continued)
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah, Mark H Weaver, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah, Léo Le Bouter, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40 work should be done on Savannah (was: Re: GNOME 40), Christopher Baines, 2021/03/30
- Re: GNOME 40,
Léo Le Bouter <=
- Re: GNOME 40, 宋文武, 2021/03/31
Re: GNOME 40, Raghav Gururajan, 2021/03/29