Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

[Jack Hill]

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Vincent Legoll wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 02/06/2020 04:56, Chris Marusich wrote:
> > Hopefully, you'll get identical results!  You don't have to run "guix
> > gc" if you don't want to, but doing so will increase the likelihood of
> > catching nondeterminism issues propagated from dependencies (which seem
> > unlikely, but you never know).  It took 3 or 4 for me hours on a modern
> > 16-core machine.

heh, it didn't take that much longer, 530 minutes on my less modern 2-core 
x86_64 machine.

> > Once we verify the binaries, we can actually start using them to build
> > stuff!  Léo has already gotten an optimistic start on that work, and
> > many things are building successfully.  Exciting!!
>
> Almost there...

yes, congratulations!

> 87f7583cf483ac3ba0ab978862873e68757bc4ddd10f739a90a9e4598f79e7fa45ec369c6efcff8d72fba87ea99f1e7a01a39450c7bf20790bc1d89d4b69a15b 
> /gnu/store/dy4fhy2vqyxqfad59mfdqdd0qpcrwmyx-bootstrap-tarballs-0/gcc-stripped-5.5.0-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.xz

I can confirm the difference with gcc-stripped. Mine was 
15f93200ef1cdde5a5721b1d4cfb4c9c5e22b4b945c77f56f60c388da99cf557d13474d14205a529cf9af9f29fb69591e17392387c0444e0efb7c85edcf30ff0

All the other hashes were the same.

Best,
Jack