[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FONTS]: Media Type Specification Changed.
From: |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice |
Subject: |
Re: [FONTS]: Media Type Specification Changed. |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2020 18:13:08 +0200 |
Raghav,
Raghav Gururajan 写道:
Oh! How are you doing now? Let me know if you need anything. I
can try
and help in any way plausible. :-)
Thanks! I'm better than I've been, don't worry.
That change has been discussed during review and was only merged
after I
gave the fact of about fontconfig. :-)
All right!
I understand. I should have mentioned in the log. But it was not
sneaky.
I tried to be very clear that I didn't actually think so. Sorry
if I failed.
But yeah, I should add that to my workflow of making
comments/logs.
Sweet.
Agreed! I do not like inconsistencies either. Please find the
patch
attached with this email.
LGTM, apart from one nitpick.
Both /share/fonts/{true,open}type are extremely common on other
distributions, while /share/fonts/webopen would be unique to Guix.
The de facto ’standard’ for (the much newer) WOFF seems to be,
well, /share/fonts/woff. So despite my previous comments about
avoiding acronyms, I'll keep the latter. We can always revisit
this later.
Applied as 7d426c5b0e27cc3e72c6e12e07b8c42055cedba0. Thanks!
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature