Re: Hyperlinks!

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:09:26 +0200
> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:58:42 +0200
>> > Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> (If anyone knows how to get ‘a.syntax-symbol’ CSS different from just
>> >> ‘a’, I’m all ears!)  
>> […]
>> > a.syntax-symbol {
>> >  color: red;
>> > }
>> > a:not(.syntax-symbol) {
>> >  background-color: blue;
>> > }  
>> 
>> The first definition would suffice if it came after any style definition
>> for just “a”.
>
> Yeah, but the behavior would be different.
>
> I thought Ludo meant that he wanted the rules for just "a" not to apply to
> "a.syntax-symbol".  With your version the rules for just "a" and the ones
> for "a.syntax-symbol" would totally both apply to "a.syntax-symbol"s.
>
> In my version, the "with class" text doesn't have a blue background.
> In yours, it would have.
>
> (I'd agree that it's often overkill)

Oh, thanks for the clarification.  I must have misunderstood Ludo’s request.

-- 
Ricardo