Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Vagrant,

Vagrant Cascadian <address@hidden> skribis:

> On 2020-04-09, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> I’ve run “make release” from the new ‘version-1.1.0’ branch and uploaded
>> the result:
>>
>>   https://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/1.1.0rc1
>
> The only tarball I see there is:
>
>   
> https://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/1.1.0rc1/guix-1.0.1.13450-01d5f2.tar.gz
>
> Which does not correspond to the commit from 01d5f2 (which happens to be
> a few hundred commits behind master)... 

The machinery picked up a stale commit ID.  Fixed in
08b14ab20ebe181690df6210a0b3f95bad494af5.

> Which commit was it actually built with? I know it's not a release, per
> se, but git tags would be *really* helpful even for release candidates...

The source tarball corresponds to
98148830c0afb9adc8acf150afc48f09aae42ac1 on ‘version-1.1.0’.  I’ve added
a tag now.

However, “make release” creates two additional commits as it updates the
‘guix’ package, and I chose to not push them.

> When building my own local guix tarballs, I found it disturbingly easy
> to get the wrong version information into the tarball .version and
> .tarball-version and consequently the resulting tarball...

Agreed, sorry for the confusion.

> I notice gnu/services/linux.scm is also missing in some of my locally
> built git snapshot tarballs, so there appears to be something broken in
> the tarball generation process.

I see you fixed it in the meantime.

Thanks for reporting these issues!

Ludo’.