Re: Python package naming: Dots vs hyphens

[Efraim Flashner]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:49:56AM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Shall I rename python-zope-* to python-zope.*?
> 

For new packages I would use whatever upstream uses in regard to '-' vs
'.'. For existing ones, how many are there? It might be best to just
leave them as-is rather than go through the dance of deprecating the old
packages.

> I am in the process of packaging mailman 3 which according to the pypi
> importer needs packages like
> 
> python-flufl.bounce
> python-flufl.i18n
> python-flufl.lock
> python-lazr.config
> python-lazr.delegates
> python-zope.component
> python-zope.configuration
> python-zope.configuration
> python-zope.event
> python-zope.interface
> 

I've actually last week started working on that. I've only done the
python part, haven't searched for any javascript or font-awesome which
I'm pretty sure I saw. I've also started working on a service for it
which I haven't committed yet, but it looks like it's going to be
complex.

https://gitlab.com/genenetwork/guix-bioinformatics/blob/master/gn/packages/mailman.scm

> 
> However the zope ones have already been added since 2fc5f186801, but
> with a hyphen instead of a dot.  Which one is correct?  Shall I rename
> python-zope-* to python-zope.*?  Or shall I correct the pypi importer?
> Ignore it?
> 

'guix package -A python-zope' lists them all as having a dash, I'd just
go ahead and make them all dashes.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature