guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 01/01: gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems.


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems.
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 20:55:46 +0200
User-agent: Notmuch/0.29 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Marius,
>>>
>>> address@hidden writes:
>>>
>>>> mbakke pushed a commit to branch staging
>>>> in repository guix.
>>>>
>>>> commit 2a9d89afb6fb869dd2bdf1e9f710f487786930fc
>>>> Author: Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
>>>> Date:   Thu Jun 13 14:08:32 2019 +0200
>>>>
>>>>     gnu: gstreamer: Skip failing test on 32-bit systems.
>>>>     
>>>>     * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gstreamer)[arguments]: When building for 
>>>> a
>>>>     32-bit system, add #:phases.
>>> [...]
>>>> +       ,@(if (not (target-64bit?))
>>>> +           ;; Skip test that fails on 32-bit systems:
>>>> +           ;; 
>>>> <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/issues/316>.
>>>> +           `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
>>>> +                        (add-before 'check 'disable-gstbufferpool-test
>>>> +                          (lambda _
>>>> +                            (substitute* "tests/check/Makefile"
>>>> +                              (("^[[:blank:]]+gst/gstbufferpool.*$")
>>>> +                               ""))
>>>> +                              #t))))
>>>> +           '())))
>>>
>>> This might be sweeping a critical bug under the rug.  Does
>>>
>>>   Unexpected critical/warning: gst_buffer_resize_range:
>>>     assertion 'bufmax >= bufoffs + offset + size' failed
>>>
>>> really sound like something we can safely ignore?
>>
>> I think you are right to be concerned.  I found the upstream commit that
>> introduced the problem.  See
>> <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/issues/316#note_176773>.
>
> *ping*?

Sorry, I've been on holiday.  Will get it sorted this weekend.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]