[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"? |
Date: |
Sun, 08 May 2016 18:51:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
> I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why
> does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of
> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to
> use "/share/emacs/site-lisp".
>
> I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their
> elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by
> default), and emacs-build-system can just use
> "/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories.
>
> "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think?
I think there was a Good Reason™. Isn’t it that we wanted to mimic what
package.el does, while avoiding collisions with package.el-installed
software?
Ludo’.
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, (continued)
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/09
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/09
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/05/16
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/17
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/05/19
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/20
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/20
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Federico Beffa, 2016/05/21
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Alex Kost, 2016/05/21
- Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/05/22
Re: Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"?,
Ludovic Courtès <=